Author Archives: Joel Nolette
Yesterday marked the end of the Court’s October Term 2016, meaning the last few cases yet to be decided were announced and various pending matters were otherwise disposed of (deets on that can be found here and other forthcoming summaries). It was a pretty typical end-of-term day, what with big cases granted cert for argument next term, an interesting constitutional decision announced, and the commentariat atwitter just trying to keep up.
The Court just unanimously decided Town of Chester, NY v. Laroe Estates, Inc., holding that an intervenor as of right under Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure must nevertheless establish Article III standing if that intervenor seeks relief distinct from the relief that the existing plaintiff is seeking. The Court did not […]
The Weekly Bipartisan shares instances of meaningful bipartisanship, on the Hill and elsewhere. This project seeks to shine a light on efforts to come together to find common ground and advance shared values in a political climate defined by polarization, an increasingly jaded citizenry, and vilification instead of constructive dialogue and debate.
That we live in an age of political hyperbole has been demonstrated too many times so as to be self-evident at this point. And this week is just another case-in-point. Yesterday, President Trump announced his decision to withdraw the United States from the non-binding, unenforceable (and probably illegal) Paris Climate Agreement. Based upon reactions from […]
The Supreme Court issued its decision this morning in BNSF v. Tyrrell, an interesting case raising the question, how much activity must a corporation engage in within a state before that corporation may be subject to general personal jurisdiction in the courts of that state, when that state is neither a corporation’s state of incorporation nor […]
“Law is but the means, justice is the end.”[i] This is Georgetown Law’s motto. Consider also, however, this statement from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes: “I hate justice . . . I know if a man begins to talk about that, for one reason or another he is shirking thinking in legal terms.”[ii] I’d like to […]
That darn vast right wing conspiracy is at it again: At least, that is, according to some of the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee. This time, the target of their angst was Judge Amul Thapar, a federal district court judge in Kentucky who is up for confirmation to the United States Court of Appeals for […]
Justice Gorsuch is just about to start his tenure on the highest court in the land, but he’s already got quite a few great quotes among his many opinions during his time on the Tenth Circuit. Here, in no particular order, is a sneak preview of things to come. *********************************** “In enlightenment theory and hard won […]